Steve Sloan on Use of Media by Unions

Matt Noyes's picture

Steve Sloan is a shop steward in Chapter 307 of CSUEU, the California State University Emplyees Union at SJSU, San Jose State University, San Jose, California. He uses cell phone photos/blogs to raise health and safety issues and videopodcasts to share interviews with union officers about issues and debates within the union. In this blog entry (from his My Unions blog), Steve advocates using the newest of the new media.

Steve Sloan is a shop steward in Chapter 307 of CSUEU, the California State University Emplyees Union at SJSU, San Jose State University, San Jose, California. He uses cell phone photos/blogs to raise health and safety issues and videopodcasts to share interviews with union officers about issues and debates within the union. In this blog entry (from his My Unions blog), Steve advocates using the newest of the new media.

 

One of the comments I hear a lot is that unions need to find a way to reach younger workers. But, when you look at how unions are using media, we typically approach workers using last century communication practices.

Primarily the main approaches to media by unions today are Web pages, print and e-mail. This is nice but it is not where younger people are spending their time. I suggest unions need to expand and explore new approaches to communications and organizing. Here a few of the ways we can reach out to younger employees using “new media”:

  • Social Networks like Facebook. In short, every union seeking to organize younger workers needs to be in Facebook. Facebook is the town hall social gathering place of the 21st Century. According to Wikipedia, “Users can join networks organized by city, workplace, school, and region to connect and interact with other people. People can also add friends and send them messages, and update their personal profile to notify friends about themselves. The website’s name refers to the paper facebooks depicting members of a campus community that some American colleges and preparatory schools give to incoming students, faculty, and staff as a way to get to know other people on campus.”
  • SMS/Texting. SMS is a great way to get information out to a lot of people, direct to their cell phone, much quicker than e-mail. E-mail is fine but it does not reach a big portion of our employees who are not sitting at a desk on a computer. Other people who are on computers all the time are so buried alive in e-mail they ignore it. There is so much junk e-mail these days the medium itself is threatened. Watch young people. They do not depend on e-mail. Instead they text message each other. When you send a text message, the reciever gets it now. Texting allows groups to define themselves virtually and in real-time. People can respond synchronously despite being geographically dispersed. We need to “get” texting to organize young people. Unions can use group text messaging tools to send text messages to large statewide groups or individually selected contacts defined by work site, bargaining unit or classification.
  • User generated content sites. Places like YouTube are great sites to create and disperse video to spread the union message. Videos of interest to University workers can “go viral” and be shared between workers quite rapidly. For communications, training and organizing, I feel the inability to use free tools like YouTube represents a lost opportunity.

In my opinion if we are going to organize younger employees we need to go where they are. If we expect them to be reached by using media they do not use, we will fail and will just appear as some sort of anachronism from the last century.

More and more young people are defining and relating to their social groups virtually using communication tools like facebook and text messaging. They use these tools to communicate physical social opportunities in real time. Younger folks text each other and say, “let’s meet at Starbucks now.” They often work synchronously, in the moment, with no prior planning. Older folks, who did not grow up with tools like text messaging and cell phones, tend to plan asynchronously. We might send out an e-mail or phone our friends and say, “let’s meet at Starbucks tomorrow at 10 a.m.”

Understanding the ability for social groups to define and communicate virtually using tools like Facebook, move synchronously using portable devices like cell phones and technologies like texting, and communicate dynamically using technologies like YouTube and understanding how pervasively this capability has been adopted by younger people, is a key concept to being able to organize them.

 

 

hc's picture

texting costs money to send and receive, right?

I don't use texting because it costs money to send and receive on a

cell phone. Whereas email is free (from the point of view that I pay

a certain rate for broadband regardless of use.) Also there's certainly

laptops and laptop like devices that can access the internet via cellular

modems so they can do email. You may be quite right that texting

is necessary to reach a segment of the population but I think there are still

people who would prefer email or to put it another way do not want to

pay for receiving text messages.

 

But anyway to facilitate this is it hard to route emails to texting?

and vice-versa? I'll admit that I don't have occasion to send text messages

so I'm not up on the technology.

I can see why people don't leap to do this from glancing at this article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_gateway

And it costs money.

 

hc's picture

a point for sms and the need for email encryption

You know there's probably something really good about sms now that you mention it, besides

what you already pointed out, and that is

that it's probably not going through the employer's system. A particularly bad

thing about email is if the union members or potential union members are

only known by an employer-controlled email address. Often it is only possible

to find an employer-based email address for a person because the employer

only lists that in some employee directory. Having the employer be able to read union-related

email is bad news. If it goes through their turf at any point they can likely read it.  And if they own the mail server

well they definitely have access to it unless the user is using encryption and

the employer doesn't have easy access to the key or password.

 

I have suggested this before but no one takes me up on it that unions should provide encrypted

email. So one way to go is implement s/mime. Each member needs their own

x.509 certificate but they can be created for free using openssl. (Assuming here we want the

encryption ability but not the authentication assurance of an expensive commercial certificate.

S/mime works pretty well with modern email clients such as thunderbird. For example one

can put portable thunderbird on an usb device along with any certs and take it around to

send and read email.

Now mailing lists are a major headache. The only program I know of that

handles s/mime on a mailing list is sympa.

http://www.sympa.org/manual/x509

(It's a feature that has to be used. Sympa mailing lists exist that don't use

s/mime so just because it's sympa doesn't make it encrypted.)

So someone sending a message to needs to have the public key for

the List and uses that to encrypt the message, then the list decrypts it

and then for each recipient, fetches their own public key and encrypts the

message and sends it. And sympa has apparently a web mail interface

wwsympa.

It would be a wonderful service for someone (either unions or

someone providing services to unions) to offer.

 

 

 

 

 

Bill Bumpus's picture

how is texting being used?

I remember Wayne Langley posting awhile back about SEIU starting to use text messaging for organizing.

It seems like a great tool for informing folks of events - the next union meeting, rallies during an organizing drive or contract negotiations, etc., but also seems very limited in terms of the amount of information you can send.

I wonder how many union members can currently access the web via their cell phones?  That would open up more possibilities - you could text members the link to a web page or video that they could then view on their phones...

hc's picture

it costs money

Probably any recent cell phone can access the internet. The problem is how

much it costs. If someone sends me something like that

I won't look at it because I would be charged for it.

But people can try to get people's cell phone numbers (and seems like

they have to know what company it is too) and see how it goes. If you can't

get people to divulge that info then you know it's not going to work without

doing anything further on it.  In the local I was in certainly most all

members had land lines, cell phones, computers, broadband and whatever

but then the problem is they don't want to hear from the union especially not

stuff about elections. That robo call stuff in particular really has put everyone on the

alert about revealing contact information. Unions need to allow people to

opt out of election contacts when they sign up. Until unions stop abusing members

with ridiculous numbers of robo and call bank calls about elections people are going to refuse to

give them any phone numbers whatsover.  Unions need to make it seem like the unions

care at least as much about the membership's opinions in _running the union_, as the

union cares if the member votes for whom the union wants them to vote.