Cutting through the clutter

Bill Bumpus's picture

I think one of the big challenges for online labor communicators is to provide content that'll attract a much larger audience than currently exists.

The internet truly has revolutionized communications my making information accessible to users worldwide on a 24/7 basis. In particular, the LabourStart and WINS provide a constant, almost-real-time source of labor news.

The problem is that while millions of workers now have access to info about the labor movement, they also have the option of visiting millions of sites that aren't labor-oriented - not to mention other corporate-dominated media like TV, radio, newspapers and magazines.

How can we create web sites (and other communication vehicles) that will attract a much larger audience of workers?

The interactivity provided by sites like this one and Purple Ocean is part of the answer - but I'm not sure that most working folks have the time or inclination to interact. Most of the communication is still going to be one-way. So technology alone isn't going to solve the problem. Ultimately it's the content that's going to bring visitors in or drive them away.

I think most union web sites need to be more provocative and entertaining.

By provocative, I mean taking a much more "class-concious" approach - if not explicitly anti-capitalist, at least harshly critical of capitalism as currently practiced. Of course the big stumbling block here is that most union members don't consider themselves anti-capitalist, and labor leaders who are have to tread carefully. But if the AFL-CIO, for example, stopped constantly using the term "working families" and brought itself to utter the words "working class" once in awhile, I think it would be a big help in shifting the terms of debate, and adding punch to the message.

In terms of entertainment, what if the AFL-CIO site (for example) included a daily comic strip - something along the lines of "Dilbert", but coming from a union perspective? If it was well done, it might provide large numbers of workers with the motivation to visit the site on a daily basis.

A variation on this theme - as more workers hopefully get access to high-speed internet connections - would be a "soap opera" - maybe a daily 5-minute video that relates an ongoing story about a struggle for workers' rights? It could be either a fictional account of a present-day workplace, or perhaps a "historical novel" about a period of labor history seen from a rank-and-file worker's perspective.

One final thought (though not website-related) - I think it would be useful to start looking at public-access television as a vehicle for getting union messages across. Here in Somerville, and in many other cities and towns, residents can submit material for broadcast on local cable. What if the AFL-CIO mailed out 1,000 DVDs of a labor news show every week, and activists got it on the air in 1,000 communities? Even if the show only had 100 viewers on each station, that would be 100,000 workers getting the news every week from a labor perspective.

Steve Dondley's picture

Distribution and creation

You cover a lot of area here but two broad categories: first there is the problem of how to tailor the message and the second is what distribution mechanism should be used to distribute it.

I think the distribution problem is of primary importance. If you don't get the message out there, it doesn't matter how effective the message is. I'm more interested in the distribution problem myself.

But I think the content development side of things should be attacked much like the open source software community develops software. There should be a common pool of writing and material for free use by union activists that they can draw upon and borrow from each other and recombine in new ways. This is a project the AFL-CIO should definitely be working on. Hopefully they are. I know they had or have some program (where on the net it can be found slips my mind) for creating PDF and documents from a web site and then allowing them to be downloaded for physical distribution at the work site. They should take it further, however.

I agree with you in general that the labor movement could in general do much better creating more powerful and engaging content.

Bill Bumpus's picture

Cartoon of the day?

An alternative to (perhaps an improvement over?) the "union comic strip" idea floated above might be the traditional editorial cartoon - after all, that's a method most printed newspapers use to lure their readers into the editorial section!

What if the AFL-CIO, the Change to Win coalition, or even one of the larger internationals commissioned a cartoonist (or a group of them) to produce a daily cartoon commenting on the news from a union perspective? It could then be made available for placement on the homepages of union sites across the country. And hopefully this would result in thousands more union members visiting their local's site on a daily - or at least on a more frequent - basis.

This would be particularly effective if used in conjunction with a daily feed of news headlines from LabourStart or elsewhere - which many locals are already using in order to ensure that new material appears on their sites every day. (Watch this space for some more comments on the subject of LabourStart, hopefully later on today...)

Steve Dondley's picture

Make this a blog item

Bill, you should post this as a blog item so it gets more prominence.

MarkDilley's picture

BigLabor.com

BigLabor.com is doing some of this. http://www.biglabor.com/

Problem is that it is only temporary. The cartoon or quote or stewards tip only lasts until the next one. I have contacted them and suggested their site would be more useful if it provide more long term content.

MarkDilley's picture

Geek speak = Signal to noise ratio

(geek speak)

So just to be a geek, this problem that Bill speaks of "Cutting through the clutter" is one of the internets biggest problems.

Geeks call the problem "signal to noise ration" - Google has become the company/service it has because it helps get you to more valuable content. (thus cutting out noise)

One of the reasons that I think that wikis are valuable is because users can constantly cut out the noise and concentrate on providing good content (signal)

(/geek speak)